Integrity in the Interview Process: Why Ghosting Destroys Opportunities, and Why Showing Up Sets You Apart
- TheFitProfessional1
- Dec 15, 2025
- 14 min read
Updated: Dec 21, 2025
By Paul T. Ayres
Executive Summary (One-Minute Read)
We are witnessing the highest levels of job-seeker ghosting ever recorded. Multiple studies released between 2024 and 2025 reveal numbers that would have seemed unbelievable even five years ago. According to large-scale research from Indeed and HRD Connect, 86% of job seekers admit to skipping interviews without notice, and 75% say they have ghosted an employer within the last year. Other surveys show that 44% of candidates across the United States acknowledge ghosting at some stage in the hiring process, while 53% say employers have ghosted them. Gen Z leads the behavior at unprecedented rates: 93% say they have skipped at least one scheduled interview, and 87% report not showing up for the first day of work. What! It’s likely you know someone who has done this. More from their perspective in the next article.
This article is a deep, principle-centered message to job seekers and employers alike, although its central moral request is directed to the candidate: do not ghost. Not because employers are perfect, they are not, but because ghosting limits your opportunities, damages your professional brand, and signals unreliability in a world where reliability has become rare. Employers have their own work to do to reduce ghosting, and Article Two will address that fully. But this first piece holds a mirror up to the job seeker: success and opportunity flow toward the people who follow through on their commitments, communicate with clarity, and behave as if their reputation matters because it does.
Ghosting is more than a skipped interview. It is a message. It tells an employer that you cannot be trusted to do the basic things well. It tells them they should not hire you because the cost of broken communication grows exponentially once someone is inside the organization. And it tells them that other candidates, the ones who show respect, close loops, and do what they say. Ultimately, employees believe they are safer bets. Employers are now acting on that information: a Resume.org study from 2025 found that over half of hiring managers have been ghosted by Gen Z after extending offers, and one in ten have simply stopped considering Gen Z candidates altogether. The consequences of ghosting are not theoretical. They are already here.
This article is written to urge job seekers to reclaim their professional identity in a world drifting toward silence and avoidance. You do not have to compete with everyone. You simply need to distinguish yourself from the majority, and the majority is now ghosting. If you choose integrity, you will quickly differentiate yourself. And once you do that, opportunity compounds. Reliability is remembered. And the person who can be trusted to show up is the person whose career takes shape in a direction they can be proud of.
The Rise of Ghosting: A Modern Breakdown in Professional Courtesy
There is a trend taking shape across the hiring landscape, and it deserves plain discussion. Ghosting. The act of disappearing without communication has moved from the edges of unprofessional behavior into the center of modern hiring.
What used to be unthinkable has become common. What used to be shocking is now expected. Expected? Wow. There’s a cost for both the job seeker and the hiring company: time. Both sides lose time, and it’s the most valuable resource we have. The numbers tell the story with a clarity that is difficult to ignore.
In early 2024, HRD Connect reported on a UK-based survey conducted by Indeed’s Hiring Lab. It revealed that 86% of job seekers have no-showed scheduled interviews without any notice, and 75% say they have ghosted an employer at some point in the past 12 months. These figures represent a massive shift in candidate behavior. Five years ago, ghosting was a frustration. Today, it is a significant obstacle to hiring in nearly every industry.
The United States tells the same story. CareerPlug’s 2024 Candidate Experience Report found that 44% of U.S. job seekers openly admit they have ghosted an employer, often after interviews have already taken place.
In that same research, 53% say they themselves have been ghosted by employers. 61% of Indeed U.S. job seekers say they have ghosted between two and four employees in the prior 12 months. It is still inappropriate. Numbers being higher do not make ghosting acceptable. There is something deeper at play here.
The symmetry is important because it explains how the moral equivalence narrative emerged. The idea that “employers do it too.” And they do, which is unacceptable and harmful in its own right. But the existence of bad behavior on one side does not justify it on the other. The presence of employer ghosting does not constitute permission for candidates to do the same. Each individual is responsible for their own standard. No excuses for employers here. However, in practical terms, some employers, especially smaller businesses, may not have the time or energy to go back into platforms like Indeed and respond to every unanswered status. Should they? Yup. Can they? Maybe not, due to limited resources. Just reality, folks, not making excuses. More on the impact on your brand in the next article on this one.
The generational dimension adds another layer. The same Indeed UK study, reported across global news outlets in 2024, found that 93% of Gen Z admit to skipping at least one scheduled interview, and 87% say they have not shown up for a first day of work at least once.
This does not mean Gen Z is irresponsible, or are they. I would love to know your opinion on this. Yes, Gen Z is navigating labor markets, communication norms, and work expectations that differ significantly from those of previous decades.
But it is also true that ‘baby boomers’ had a much different environment than their parents as part of the ‘greatest generation.’ And so on. Right? But the data shows that avoidance, particularly avoidance of difficult conversations, is now common behavior among younger candidates.
Other research supports this pattern: when surveyed about “career catfishing,” a term describing the phenomenon of accepting job offers and then never appearing, 34% of Gen Z said they had done this at least once, compared to 24% of Millennials, 11% of Gen X, and 7% of Boomers. Hmm. Is there an overall values breakdown going on here? Could it be that it's becoming even more important for those ‘few’ that actually do show up for interviews, your company’s interviewers need to dial into alignment of values, work ethic, and performance expectations even more? Yup, likely.
Employers have reacted in variable ways; some thoughtfully, others defensively. A Resume.org survey conducted in 2025 found that 54% of hiring managers have been ghosted by Gen Z candidates after extending formal offers, and one in ten employers now say they will not consider Gen Z candidates at all.
Wow. Let that sink in. That response might not be fair, or is it? Is it appropriate? What is the bigger picture here? Employers are fed up and reacting, but is it too much? Or is it survival mode? What if you flew a candidate across the country, took them to dinner, introduced them to the team, they accept the offer… and then they no-show? Or at an earlier step, don’t get on the plane for the plant trip? This is real money and real time, and the reaction is real. People, we have a problem. And you can do something about it as a job seeker starting today. Simply say NO if you’re not interested. This is not saving a spot in line like you might for your buddy at the high school basketball game. There is a real investment of resources and a real commitment (well, most of the time). Could it be the ghosters are now hiring? Yikes. Ghosting has consequences for everyone, including those who never ghost but share demographic traits with those who do.
This is the world candidates now enter when searching for meaningful work. It is a world shaped by high competition, rising expectations, new norms, and an unfortunate breakdown in communication and follow-through.
Against this backdrop, the candidate who behaves with integrity has a competitive advantage that cannot be overstated.
Why Ghosting Hurts Candidates More Than Employers
It appears from some research that at least one primary reason for ghosting stems from a desire to avoid conflict or discomfort. In a world of text communication, disappearing feels easier than saying no. For many, it may even feel harmless. But ghosting is not harmless. It has direct and lasting consequences, most of which candidates never see.
Recruiters who encounter ghosting record it in applicant tracking systems. They keep informal notes. Hiring managers remember the experience. Recruiters move between companies and carry their institutional knowledge with them. When a candidate ghosts an employer, they assume nothing happened as a result. But on the other side, there is usually a permanent record, written or unwritten, of a lack of follow-through. Some recruiters share information too, right or wrong. As a candidate, you never want to be on these lists, ever. It’s simple, say no (or yes, then show up!).
In an economy where opportunity increasingly flows toward the trustworthy, the competent, and the communicative, ghosting is a form of self-sabotage. Future roles, referrals, or recruiter callbacks that the candidate never hears about silently disappear. There is no email saying, “We chose someone else because you ghosted last time.” There is only the absence of future opportunity. The ghosting candidate never sees the door that closed. And many doors close this way.
Beyond opportunity, ghosting tells the employer something about how the individual will behave under pressure inside the organization. Interviews are a performance, yes, but they are also a preview. Employers infer future behavior from present behavior.
When a candidate disappears without a word, it signals to the employer that this person may struggle with accountability, avoid difficult conversations, or fail to follow through when commitments become inconvenient.
For roles that require reliability, and most roles do, ghosting becomes a deal-breaker. Having said this, however, the instances where a candidate might show back up are very few, maybe fewer in large companies with huge geographies. You can bet the leaders in those organizations do, in fact, have your name. Smaller companies, yeah, a lot less likely they’ll have a list. For small companies, it’s a pain measure: how much time and money did I ‘waste’ on this person? People remember when they get burned because it burned.
Finally, ghosting reduces the candidate’s leverage. When you build a reputation for communication and integrity, employers are more likely to be flexible with salary, timing, remote options, and development opportunities. When you build a reputation for avoiding conversations, employers may decide not to negotiate at all, for those very few who haven’t already closed the door permanently. Few and far between, they are. The most valuable currency you have in your career is TRUST. Without it, everything requires more work, more explanation, more effort. With it, doors open that would otherwise remain shut.
The Real Cost of Ghosting for Employers and Their Teams
While candidates often underestimate the impact of their silence, employers feel it deeply. Ghosting creates operational and financial strain long before a candidate ever realizes the consequences. When a candidate disappears without warning, interviewers waste hours preparing, adjusting schedules, coordinating team members, and setting aside time. In small and mid-sized companies, where most Americans work, these disruptions are costly.
When a candidate does not show, hiring managers often spend time they cannot easily recover. Projects get delayed. Internal employees must absorb the workload. Customers wait longer for service. In some cases, revenue-generating activities stall because teams are understaffed. In healthcare roles, a ghosted candidate can mean further staff burnout, reduced patient coverage, and the need for costly temporary labor. In manufacturing, it may mean overtime payouts or delayed orders. In professional services, it can mean client dissatisfaction or lost accounts. Worse yet, delays where real need rules the day, accidents and injuries can occur.
Lighthouse Research and Grayscale’s 2023 study attempted to quantify these costs and found that each interview ghosting incident carries a tangible financial burden. The number itself, estimated at roughly $100 per occurrence, may seem small until multiplied across hiring cycles. The cost is much higher when ripple effects are factored in: lower team morale, team burnout, delayed timelines, lost productivity, safety concerns, and strained hiring pipelines.
The human cost is equally significant. Hiring managers and frontline supervisors often take ghosting personally, not in an emotional sense, but in a motivational sense. When candidates repeatedly disappear, managers become hesitant to engage. They stop getting excited about new applicants. They may approach interviews with skepticism rather than optimism. This is a cultural cost that compounds. Organizations are most effective when their leaders believe in the possibility of finding strong talent. Ghosting erodes that belief. It’s hard to capture the importance of this, especially for small and growing companies.
The timing is so important because many small companies have to earn their way into the affordability window, often at the expense of sacrifices. Any recruiter would rather hear you say ‘no thank you’ and not even offer a reason than disappear. The sooner the better. If you are not all in, don’t take the plant trip. Be honest with yourself. If there is really little or no chance you’re going to take the job after the trip, don’t go. It is more important for your career to establish trust and integrity than to put a plant trip you don’t care about in your brag bag. Really, your friends couldn't care less about how many trips you’ve taken. Yeah, I know, we all hope this is the exception, but it makes a hard, cold, and real point.
Yet here is the nuance: even though ghosting harms employers, the purpose of this article is not to defend every employer or suggest that companies do everything perfectly. They do not. Employers who ghost candidates have their own repairs to make, and we will address that in Article Two. But right now, focusing on the candidate’s behavior reveals something important: the employer’s experience is not the moral center of this discussion; the candidate’s future is.
A Tale of Two Professionals: One Who Communicates and One Who Disappears
Consider two candidates: both talented, both technically qualified, both competing for roles in the same industry.
One candidate excels on paper but fails to communicate. They schedule interviews and then cancel late or fail to show. They apply to roles they are not truly interested in and disengage when a better opportunity arises. They hesitate to send a clear “no,” believing silence is easier than honesty.
The second candidate communicates clearly from the beginning. They respond to emails promptly. They confirm interviews. If a better opportunity arises, they respectfully withdraw, communicating professionally. If personal circumstances change, they inform the recruiter early. They may not have the flashiest résumé, but they have something more valuable: a reliable pattern of behavior.
Now imagine the hiring manager’s perspective. The first candidate is a question mark. Even if offered the job, will they show up? Will they decide the night before that something else feels more exciting? Will they disappear mid-project when the work gets difficult? The second candidate inspires confidence through simple acts of professionalism. The employer sees someone who understands that work is a series of commitments, not a series of impulses.
This difference becomes magnified at scale. When trust is scarce, the candidate who proves trustworthy becomes the one employers fight to hire.
Reliability begins to function like a superpower.
The Compounding Effect of Integrity in a High-Ghosting Environment
Professionals often underestimate the compounding effect of doing what you say you will do.
Integrity is not a single action; rather, it is a pattern. And in the professional world, patterns tell stories. Over time, your actions create your reputation, and your reputation creates your opportunities.
In today’s hiring environment, where ghosting has become widely normalized, integrity stands out more sharply than ever. When most candidates are disappearing, the candidate who closes every loop with clarity becomes memorable. When most candidates fail to respond, the candidate who over-communicates becomes the one who earns second chances and expanded opportunities. When most candidates avoid difficult conversations, the candidate who embraces straightforward communication becomes the one employers trust to represent them with clients, customers, and senior leadership.
Every career grows along the lines of trust. The most important opportunities, or the ones that change your trajectory, almost always go to the individuals who have demonstrated consistent reliability. Trust multiplies over years and decades, not weeks or months. Even for job seekers early in their careers, the professional foundation they build today becomes the groundwork for everything that follows.
Ghosting, by contrast, is a withdrawal from your reputation, even if you do not feel the cost immediately. A single ghosting episode may not close every door forever, but it begins creating a pattern that employers notice. Bad habits form with reps just like good habits do.
Professionals often ask what separates high-performing candidates from everyone else. The answer is rarely brilliance. It is rarely technical expertise. Often, it is reliability. High performers do what they say they will do. They communicate clearly. They respect others’ time. They show up prepared. These behaviors are not glamorous, but they are transformative.
Ghosting is almost always the opposite of these habits. And in the long run, habits prevail.
A New Standard for Job Seekers in 2025 and Beyond
We are entering a hiring period in which both employers and candidates must elevate their behavior. Remote work has changed expectations. Technology has created distance between people. Generational norms around communication have shifted. And labor markets continue to swing between tight and soft conditions. That means professionals need to return to timeless principles that work regardless of economic or cultural climate.
1. The first principle is simple: your word matters. Saying yes to an interview means something. Agreeing to a time means something. Committing to follow up means something. Your word builds your brand far more powerfully than your résumé does.
2. The second principle is clarity. You do not owe employers a long story about why you are withdrawing from a process or declining an interview, but you do owe them clarity. A concise message is enough. Clarity is the foundation of professional respect.
3. The third principle is timeliness. Communication delayed is often communication denied. If you know you are no longer interested, say so. If another opportunity has appeared, notify the employer. When you respond quickly and respectfully, you set yourself apart from the majority who do not.
4. The final principle is consistency. Doing the right thing once is not difficult. Doing it consistently is what builds trust. And trust is the currency of the professional world.
These principles not only protect your career; they elevate it.
A Direct Message to Employers
Although this article focuses primarily on the candidate’s role, employers deserve a brief message here as well. If a candidate ghosts you, that is information. It is not a personal attack. It is not a reason to lower your own standards or become cynical about hiring. It is simply a demonstration that the individual does not treat commitments with the seriousness required for the role.
Employers should honor what ghosting reveals. When someone disappears during the interview process, they are telling you, and without ambiguity, that they are not ready for the responsibilities of the role. It is indirectly a gift of clarity. And employers should respond accordingly by investing their time and energy in candidates who demonstrate the maturity, communication, and integrity that future performance requires.
Conclusion: The Professional Advantage of Doing What You Say
In a hiring landscape characterized by high ghosting rates, economic uncertainty, shifting norms, and increased automation, professionals have an opportunity to distinguish themselves through timeless behavior.
Doing what you say you will do is no longer baseline professionalism. It is a differentiator. It is a brand.
It signals to employers that you are the kind of person who can be trusted with difficult work, meaningful projects, and opportunities that shape careers.
Integrity is not about perfection. It is about consistency. When you choose to communicate clearly, to close loops, to show respect for others’ time, and to act with accountability even in small circumstances, you elevate yourself. Your reputation becomes an asset, not an unknown. And in a world where so many people are ghosting, flaking, and avoiding difficult conversations, the individual who steps forward with professionalism becomes the person employers trust. And trust is the beginning of every meaningful opportunity.
You cannot control whether someone ghosts you. You cannot control the broader patterns in the labor market. But you can control your standard. And that standard will become the difference between being part of the crowd and being someone employers actively seek out. In a high-ghosting environment, the simple act of showing up becomes a competitive advantage. When you do what you say you will do, even when it is inconvenient, you send a message about who you are. And the world responds accordingly.
If you want to stand out in a crowded market, start with the one thing most people overlook: execution. And if you’d like support building a stronger, more consistent professional brand, connect with me. It's a capability you can start building today.
Paul T. Ayres
Business, Executive, Leadership & Life Coach
Email: paul@thefitprofessional1.com
Website: www.thefitprofessional1.com
Connect with me on socials!
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fitpro1coach/
Professional Bibliography
(Asterisk: “n.p.” indicates no page numbers provided by the online source.)
Ayres, Paul. “FitProfessional1 Leadership Principles: Integrity and Follow-Through in Professional Life.” TheFitProfessional1.com, n.d., n.p.
Bhatnagar, Jyotsna. Personifwy by Wishyogi: Not Afraid of Ghost Talent. Harvard Business Publishing / Ivey Publishing Case W27518, 2023, pp. 1–7.
CareerPlug. 2024 Candidate Experience Report. CareerPlug, Jan. 2024, PDF, n.p.
“Career Catfishing: Why Gen Z Accept Job Offers – Then Ghost Their New Employers.” The Guardian, 19 Feb. 2025, n.p.
HRD Connect Staff. “Job Ghosting Is Rife: 86% of Jobseekers No-Show for Interviews.” HRD Connect, 16 Feb. 2024, n.p.
Resume.org Research Team. “1 in 10 Employers Refuse to Hire Gen Z Candidates Due to Ghosting.” Resume.org, 11 June 2025, n.p.
Talroo Insights Team (Pontrelli, Casey). “Navigating Candidate Ghosting in 2025 and How to Minimize It.” Talroo Recruitment Insights, 2 Jan. 2025, n.p.
Zhao, Daniel. “Conversation Starter: Ghosting Creeps Higher.” Glassdoor Economic Research Blog, 16 Oct. 2024, n.p.
Comments